Designing a wand - do they own it, or Represent it

2 min read

Deviation Actions

SocietyOfWandmakers's avatar
Published:
3.1K Views
I'm curious to see where people go with this, as it seems to set here apart from canon in a way.
Ok, so when designing a wand, is it going to be something that they would readily carry or something that represents them Critically. And this seems like there is a lot of overlap, but I don't know how to explain it any other way.
Like, I doubt you would design Harrys wand like it is in canon, but they seem to be more about practicality than design.
This arises because I'm currently designing newt scamanders wand. And was trying to decide how much animal I work into the wand itself. The character is less likely to carry around something that is an effigy, but it's still something he devotes his life to.

According to sources surrounding the film, his wand both incorporates bone and shell. Yet doesn't have any animal materials in it at all. This represents the 2 sides to this argument to me.

Keen to hear your thoughts

Note - I'm not replicating the film wand, just trying to understand the character in relation to the craft
© 2016 - 2024 SocietyOfWandmakers
Comments4
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
elocnodnarb's avatar
I would argue that it is different for each character.
examples: 
fleur and Mundungus - both of their wands seem to represent them very well. Fleur's wand looks very ornate and yet upon further examination is rather simple fundamentally. Mundungus' looks fancy and expensive yet it is made from a rather common "cheap" wood.

Sirius - note that his tattoos match the runes carved into his wand, he modeled himself after his wand, not the other way around.

James Potter - Covered in doodles, coincidence that this top of the class student also likes to sit and doodle? I think not.